Next: Suggestions for Further Work
Up: Polarized Electron Reflection Study
Previous: Intermediate Experiment 2
  Contents
Conclusions
Having presented and analysed the experimental results, it is time to
summarize the conclusions that can be drawn from these results.
- A non-zero Weiss field in the cobalt films has been detected;
according to the Bayesian model comparison method, the experimental
data rule out the null hypothesis, in which no such field has been
detected, very strongly indeed, leaving it with a posterior
probability of
; this is about as firm a conclusion as it is conceivable to obtain, although properties of
the Monte Carlo method used to estimate this probability suggest
that some caution should be applied to the sheer size of the number.
- The traditional estimator of the Mott asymmetry, and therefore
of the reflected electron beam's spin polarization, provides
well-defined, mostly non-zero values, indicating, in support of the
last aforesaid Bayesian conclusion, that, despite the systematic
error in the electron arrival rates, described below, the
experiments have successfully detected the cobalt's Weiss field.
- The experimental results can be used to estimate quantitatively
the electrostatic potential
and Weiss field
in the samples;
the estimates obtained, using the Bayesian parameter estimation
method, are shown in figures 5.9 and
5.10. As can be seen from the figures, the estimates
produced are extremely imprecise, i.e. the quoted standard deviation
random errors in them are very large. The bulk of the large random
error does not result from the posterior probability distribution,
over the electrostatic potential or Weiss field, having a wide peak,
but rather from this probability distribution having two
widely-separated peaks, associated with the fact that the
theoretical equation 2.8, when inverted to give the
ratio
, as a function of the measurable reflected beam
polarization, gives two solutions for
, for any given
polarization; however, the moderately large random errors found in
the traditional estimators of Mott asymmetry, related to the fact
that the measured beam polarization is, in some sense, a small
difference between two large numbers (the spin-up and spin-down
currents,) suggest that each of the two peaks will itself be quite
broad. Ironically, this lack of precision contributes positively to
the ability to draw such an immensely firm conclusion that a
non-zero Weiss field has been detected; underlying the Occam's razor
that implements [85,52] itself
automatically in Bayesian statistics is the idea that a model should
not be allowed to use information from experimental data to
fine-tune its adjustable parameters, then recycle the same
information to support it against other models. In the problem at
hand, the model with extra adjustable parameters (non-zero Weiss
fields in the cobalt films) does not significantly fine-tune those
parameters using the experimental data, as is evident from the large
residual random errors in those parameters. Therefore, Occam's
razor does not significantly penalise this model, relative to the
simpler model with the Weiss fields fixed at zero.
- The spin polarization produced by the cobalt's Weiss field, as
estimated in traditional fashion, is of a similar order of magnitude
(
) to that found by other workers in various independent
laboratories, using polarized electron reflection from other
ferro-magnetic transition metals (section
2.10.)
- There is some strong evidence that the stray magnetic field of
the sample (or of some part of the sample holder) is significantly
affecting the electron trajectories, creating a
magnetization-dependent systematic error in the measured electron
arrival rates at the Mott polarimeter's detectors.
The genuine effect of the cobalt's Weiss field can be detected, even
in the presence of the systematic error due to stray magnetic fields,
because the two have significantly different signatures in the
electron arrival rates at the channeltrons. When the sample
magnetization is reversed, the characteristic behaviour caused by the
stray-field systematic error is for the electron arrival rates, at the
two channeltrons, to change by the same factor, in the same sense,
i.e. either both increase, or both decrease. The characteristic
behaviour caused by a genuine spin polarization, produced by the
cobalt's Weiss field, on the other hand, is for the electron arrival
rates, at the two channeltrons, to change by the same factor, in
opposite senses, i.e. one increases and the other decreases. It was
also this dissimilarity in signatures that allowed the systematic
error to be noticed in the first place (table
5.3.)
In physical terms, the various methods used to analyse the data,
namely the least-squares curve fitting of chapter 5, the
asymmetry estimation of section 5.2,
and the Bayesian inference of section 5.3
are all seeking the same effect, notwithstanding their substantial
differences of statistical approach. All of them are testing for the
electron arrival rates changing, on sample magnetization reversal, by
the same factor in opposite senses. All of them are, therefore,
sensitive to genuine spin polarizations, rather than to the
stray-field systematic error, and all of them declare decisively that
they have found such polarizations.
Of course, it is possible for both a genuine polarization and a stray
field to occur simultaneously, and for their effects to be
superimposed on one another. This appears to be the case in the
experiments discussed in the present thesis. In this case, the
systematic error in the electron arrival rates, caused by the stray
field, has the following two effects.
- Quantitative estimation of the polarizations, and therefore of
the electro-magnetic parameters of the sample, by any of the data
processing methods, is rather imprecise, i.e. has a large random
error; however, this effect does not dominate the standard deviation
random errors found in the estimates of electro-magnetic parameters,
the bulk of which result from the double-valued nature of equation
2.8, when inverted to give electro-magnetic parameters
as a function of spin polarization.
- Visual inspection of the electron arrival rate data cannot
easily pick out the individual effects (genuine spin polarization
and stray field) from the superposition of the two.
It would, therefore, be much better if a way were found to eliminate
the stray field, both to make the essential physical process of spin
polarization by the exchange interaction more obvious visually, and to
improve quantitative estimation of the Weiss field involved. Lind
[65] found such a method for his particular
experimental configuration, which involved following the field applied
to magnetize the sample with a smaller applied field, in the opposite
direction. It is, however, unclear how Lind determined that this
method was a success, what physical mechanism allows the technique to
work, and whether it will be applicable to experimental apparatus
other than Lind's, such as the apparatus used for the present thesis.
Having drawn conclusions from the experimental results hereinbefore
presented, some suggestions will now be given as to future research
directions related to the work in this thesis.
Subsections
Next: Suggestions for Further Work
Up: Polarized Electron Reflection Study
Previous: Intermediate Experiment 2
  Contents
Daniel Christopher Hatton
2004-11-30